Whether you’re an avid fan of oral hygiene, or just a regular consumer who believes in taking care of their oral health as much as possible, when thinking of electric toothbrushes, or anything regarding dental health, the first two brands that will occur to you, or anyone for that matter, are Oral-B and Philips.
In fact, believe it or not, Oral-B and Philips have been the frontrunners for multiple decades now, and while they initially rose to prominence due to their knack for producing the most affordable manual toothbrushes, they further clinched their legacy by dropping some of the best electric toothbrushes that the users as well as the world of dentistry have come across as of 2023.
From having technological means that analyses the brushing form of users to offering various brushing modes that cater to different types of minor and major oral health issues, there’s no doubt that Philips Sonicare and Oral-B will keep fighting for the throne years from now as well. However, at the moment, one of them seems to have the edge over the other, and will continue leading the way if the opponent fails to respond sooner rather than later.
From carrying a deep rewind on each brand to pitting some of their most compelling models against each other, here’s all we’ve done before picking the dominant brand amongst Oral-B and Philips Sonicare!
Table of Contents
- Oral-B vs. Philips Sonicare: Who’s Really Dominating The Oral Industry?
- Philips Sonicare vs. Oral-B: Taking A Look At Some Of Their Promising Prospects
- Oral-B iO 9 vs. Sonicare Prestige 9900
- Oral-B iO 7 vs. Philips DiamondClean Smart
- Oral-B 8000 vs. DiamondClean Classic
- Sonicare 7500 vs. Oral-B 7000
- Sonicare 5300 vs. Oral-B 5000
- Sonicare 4100 vs Oral-B 1000
- Sonicare 5100 vs Oral-B Gum and Sensitive Care
- Sonicare vs. Oral-B Kids
- Philips One vs. Oral-B Pro Health
- Final Takeaway
- Philips Sonicare vs. Oral-B: Taking A Look At Some Of Their Promising Prospects
A Brief Intro About Both Brands
Before we dive into all the promising aspects about each brand and pick a winner using facts and figures, here’s a backstory on both brands that you can read through if you want to learn more about how they were discovered and when they rose to prominence in the world of electric toothbrushes!
Oral-B was initially founded in the early 50s by Dr. Robert W. Houston, who happened to be a periodontal specialist. Prior to being rebranded as Oral-B, the name of the brand was the Hutson toothbrush, which lasted from the mid 40s to the 50s.
After the successful launch of Oral-B 60, the first ever toothbrush of the Oral-B series, the company rose to prominence and generated more revenue with each year due to their marvellous invention.
In the early 60s, in hopes of going back to pursuing his career as a professional periodontist, Hudson sold his toothbrush business and moved back to San Jose. Two full decades later, however, Oral-B became a part of Gillette, a prominent American brand that makes top-notch razors to this day.
Braun, which also happened to be in collaboration with the American razor brand at the time, eventually started using Oral-B for manufacturing electric toothbrushes in the mid 80s, and the rest was history!
Although Dutch brand Philips was discovered in the later years of the 18th century, it took them almost a decade to realise the importance of maintaining good oral hygiene.
Prior to batting an eye, David Giulani, an entrepreneur with a degree in electrical engineering, collaborated with Drs. David Engel and Roy Martin, two professors at the University of Washington, to form a company titled GEMTech in hopes of producing a technologically advanced toothbrush in 1987. After years of research, GEMTech finally released their first prototype, titled the Sonicare, in November, 1992.
The company subsequently changed its name to Optiva Corporation in 1996 and was acquired by Philips in 2000. The Sonicare was named the best selling toothbrush in 2001, and later rebranded as “Philips Sonicare” in 2003 to have a more influential presence in countries as big as the United States of America.
Oral-B vs. Philips Sonicare: Who’s Really Dominating The Oral Industry?
At the end of the day, it’s safe to say that both Oral-B and Sonicare could be great tools to rely on if you’re seeking an accessible way to deal with major oral health issues like tooth decay and minor ones like plaque build-up. However, when a series of important factors are thrown into the mix and taken into account, Oral-B seems to have the edge over its counterpart for this bout, being the more dominant brand over Philips as well as the other companies in the oral industry.
From a technological standpoint, Oral-B is surely the brand beginners as well as veteran users of electric toothbrushes can benefit from immensely. While a minor portion of the models comprise 2D technology and brush heads that only rotate in a circular motion, most pieces of equipment that Oral-B have made so far comprise brush heads with 3D technology that pulsates and oscillates. In simpler words, it moves in a rapid circular motion that is known for removing plaque in a more efficient manner than brush heads that are manufactured by other brands. As opposed to a manual toothbrush and Sonicare, most Oral-B models attain the ability to remove more plaque.
While the Sonicare technology used in the Philips Sonicare models are surely more lenient for those that have sensitive gums and teeth, both motions that it offers could be less effective at removing residue in between one’s gums and teeth than models manufactured by Oral-B. Nonetheless, despite being unable to have the upperhand over its fierce rival, Philips Sonicare is still miles ahead of the rest of the candidates in the lot.
Design and Build
Although both Oral-B and Philips Sonicare have models that comprise a lean build and are exceptionally easy on the eye, the minimal design that Philips Sonicare implements and utilises when creating most models rises above in the end, and makes Sonicare more favourable than Oral-B.
That’s not all that makes it so compelling, however, as the matte paint job applied on most Sonicare models looks more premium than the glossy paint job that is typically found within the groundwork of Oral-B’s electric toothbrushes. Even the travel case provided with Sonicare seems to be made of excellent quality and offers more durability than that provided with its counterpart.
Additionally, while a few of the high-end models of Oral-B comprise LED displays which cater to those that are all about colours and the visuals, the simple build that even top-grade Sonicare installations have could work wonders for beginners, especially for those that are technologically handicapped.
Oral-B have mid-tier models that offer at least 4 modes to users and top-grade installations that comprise over 6 different types of brushing modes. In contrast, Philips Sonicare models mostly offer 3 or sometimes one generic brushing mode to users and a handful of equipment that contain 5 brushing modes at max.
Additionally, both brands have a series of electric toothbrushes that contain a built-in quadpacer, pressure sensors, and bluetooth connectivity to analyse and improve one’s brushing habits.
However, the Brush Sync technology that Sonicare models contain, which mainly monitors the health of brush heads and reminds users to replace the piece of equipment once every 3 to 4 months, is probably the feature that makes Philips stand out in the eyes of many, and a feature that makes Oral-B lose a considerable amount of points.
When it comes to accessories, Oral-B is a brand that just keeps giving. In addition to providing users with the electric toothbrush, the brand typically includes a series of extra brush heads, a travel case, a charger and documentation inside the packaging. Furthermore, within the packaging of premium models, users will find all the previously-mentioned pieces of equipment and a power2go travel case that comprises a built-in charger.
On the other hand, even though Philips Sonicare does provide users with plenty of accessories when they invest in one of the premium models that it offers, the Dutch brand only provides users with one brush head, a travel case, a charging stand (if the model contains a rechargeable battery), and documentation in addition to the electric toothbrush itself.
Philips Sonicare often release prototypes that consist of a Li-Ion battery which typically lasts for over 2 weeks if used on a daily basis. On the other hand, while Oral-B comes up with toothbrushes that are extremely flexible and offer a range of brushing modes, most toothbrushes usually last for 2 weeks at most.
Certain models of Sonicare can also last for 90 days due to not being as advanced from a technological standpoint. Nonetheless, amongst Oral-B and Sonicare, it is very evident how the Dutch brand is more reliable when it comes to achieving survival and reliability.
Certain features that Philips Sonicare come with can be useful for kids as well as adults. One feature in particular, known as Brush Sync technology, could be a must-have for those that are rather oblivious when it comes to monitoring the lifespan of a brush head. However, this feature has yet to be incorporated into a model of Oral-B.
Despite being outclassed by Philips Sonicare in a few ways, Oral-B is still the brand that is more family-friendly at the end of the day due to the affordable price tags that most of their models have. While the sleek and minimalist build behind each model is definitely an appealing factor to consider about Sonicare, most Oral-B models won’t require anyone to cross $150. In fact, if you settle for the best Oral-B model out there, which happens to be the iO Series 9, it’s safe to say that you won’t have to spend an unhealthy amount of $300.
Due to being more cost efficient, Oral-B takes the crown when it comes to being family-friendly. However, the inconsistent battery life that most affordable Oral-B models contain renders the brand incapable of being the better travel buddy.
Most Philips Sonicare models contain Li-Ion batteries that last for over 3 weeks. In other words, if you brush your teeth twice a day, you can use one of the more affordable models of Philips for over 21 days before it drains out; making it a great companion to count on during trips.
Philips Sonicare is a brand that reeks of elegance, contains prototypes that not only serve looks, but could be an effective solution to all your oral health issues due to the various types of brushing modes, and all the brush heads that the company has produced so far. Even though most characteristics that their models have can also be found on models produced by Oral-B, the Brush Sync Technology that a majority of Philips’ electric toothbrushes consist of has yet to be mimicked or replicated by Oral-B, which could encourage tech wizzes to side with the Dutch company.
However, despite being behind in a few ways, Oral-B remains the dominant brand over its counterpart in this bout. While the toothbrushes have yet to be revamped with a better battery life, Oral-B offers affordability, more brushing modes that resolves all kinds of oral health issues, and more brush heads in the packaging of each product.
Additionally, Oral-B also produces pieces of equipment that can monitor a whopping 16 zones in one’s mouth to improve their brushing habits and give them useful feedback on the current situation of their dental hygiene. In contrast, even the best Sonicare model comprises 6 tracking zones; a trait that you can find in mid-tier models of Oral-B, such as the iO series 7 and 6.
Philips Sonicare vs. Oral-B: Taking A Look At Some Of Their Promising Prospects
If the only goal on your mind is to improve the complexion of your teeth and get rid of the existing oral hygiene issues you suffer from, the previous take should hardly play a pivotal factor in your decision making. In fact, both Sonicare and Oral-B have loads of installations that can subside even the most stubborn piece of plaque around your teeth and between your gums.
From top-grade models to affordable prototypes to inventions that will help your children learn about the importance of brushing on a daily basis with the right form, here are some of the best electric toothbrushes of Oral-B as well as Philips Sonicare; and a sneak peek of what happens when the models are pitted against each other.
Oral-B iO 9 vs. Sonicare Prestige 9900
The two most premium models that provide users with optimal performance and bring to the table the best possible results are Sonicare Prestige 9900 and the iO Series 9; two models that can be seen as candidates if you’re willing to spend big.
|Model||Prestige 9900||Oral-B iO Series 9|
|Battery Life||2+ weeks||2 weeks|
|Key Features||Brush Sync Technology||Power2go travel case; magnetic charging stand|
|Recommended Pick||Sonicare Prestige 9900|
The iO Series 9 is a great companion to take into account due to the 7 modes that it offers. In addition to having traditional modes like Gum Care and Daily Clean, the iO 9 also has two special modes that cleans the tongue and caters to those that have vulnerable gums and teeth; Tongue Clean and Super Sensitive.
The handle of the iO 9 has a colourful LED display that monitors the battery life, gives users access to the brushing modes, and enables users to track the progress of each brushing session with the help of a 2 minute timer. The advanced tracking that it has also gives users access to 16 different zones in the mouth, which can be a help in need to those that are determined to improve their oral hygiene.
Although the battery life of the Series 9 isn’t anything out of the ordinary, the magnetic charger it comes with is surely a positive for users that have a packed schedule and travel rather frequently. The magnetic charger takes the model’s battery life from 0 to 100 in a matter of 3 hours. The travel case of the iO 9 is just as useful, as the power2go case comes with a built-in compartment for charging the device.
On the contrary, Prestige 9900 falls short when it comes to the brushing modes it offers, but gains back momentum due to its battery life, which runs for more than 2 weeks at a time.
The LED ring it contains mainly invigilates the pressure that is being applied to the gums when brushing, and pops off in purple when users end up applying too much force when brushing their teeth.
In contrast to the iO series 9, the Prestige 9900 can only track 6 zones; a trait that can be found in the earlier models of the iO Series. However, Prestige 9900 comprises Brush Sync technology, which could be crucial if you often forget to replace your overly-used brush head on time. Unlike the Oral-B model, the Prestige 9900 also turns off once the recommended duration of 2 minutes has been crossed.
Nonetheless, despite having less brushing mode, Sonicare’s Prestige 9900 could be the better option amongst these two. While users should most definitely invest in its counterpart if they have sensitive teeth, the battery life, brush sync technology, and the shut off system of the Sonicare Prestige 9900 could significantly improve one’s brushing habits and oral health if they’re properly utilised.
Oral-B iO 7 vs. Philips DiamondClean Smart
Two excellent options that could be the perfect candidates for those that want to play it safe are Oral-B iO 7 and Philips DiamondClean Smart.
|Model||DiamondClean Smart||Oral-B iO Series 7|
|Battery Life||3 Weeks||2 Weeks|
|Key Features||Intensity levels, Brush head indicator, Automatic Power Off||AI Zone Tracking, LED Display, Magnetic Charging Stand|
|Recommended Pick||DiamondClean Smart|
The DiamondClean Smart is a specialist at removing plaque. It brings to the table 4 modes with 3 intensity settings that effectively clean each area around the mouth without compromising the state of one’s gums and teeth.
It also comes with a better battery life than the iO Series 7 and can survive for over 21 days at a time once it’s fully charged. The handle only consists of two buttons; one for the power, and another for toggling through the modes. While it could be a dealbreaker for some, the minimalist build of the DiamondClean Smart can be great for those that want a gadget that is easy to use.
In addition to having an exceptional battery life, Philips DiamondClean Smart also shuts down once each brushing session surpasses the duration of two minutes, further adding to its appeal.
Even though the Diamond Clean Smart offers promising traits that can only be denied for so long, the iO Series 7 of Oral-B is just as beneficial. Unlike the DiamondClean Smart, the Series 7 has a black and white LED display that invigilates the battery life, brushing duration, and enables users to skim through all the available brushing modes that the model contains. It has AI Zone tracking that tracks 6 zones around one’s mouth; all of which are known to help users with improving their brushing technique.
The build of this iO 7 is just as classy as the rest of the installations in the iO Series. However, just like its predecessors and successors, the iO 7 has a handle with no grip, which could be a nightmare if you’re as clumsy as I am.
Nonetheless, since it does have a magnetic charging stand that enables fast charging, it puts up a great fight when pitted against the DiamondClean Smart, but eventually suffers a loss due to the brush head indicator that it doesn’t have.
Oral-B 8000 vs. DiamondClean Classic
If you’ve recently learned about electric toothbrushes, starting with a good instalment should be your go-to move. However, if you feel that you’re currently working under a budget just like everyone else, two excellent models that you can take into consideration are the Oral-B 8000 and Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Classic!
|Model||DiamondClean Classic||Oral-B 8000|
|Battery Life||2 Weeks||12 Days|
|Key Features||Automatic Power off; Charging Glass||Real Time Tracking; Built-in Pressure Sensor|
|Recommended Pick||Oral-B 8000|
The Genius 8000 comes with 5 cleaning modes which is similar to most top-notch models of Oral-B. Although it does come with 5 cleaning modes, the handle only comprises 4 different icons, which could be a bit confusing to say the least.
Just like most technologically advanced electric toothbrushes, the Oral-B 8000 has a pressure sensor and a quadpacer, which can prevent newbies from crossing the recommended duration of two minutes and use the brush head at a generous amount of speed and force. It also contains an LED smart ring, which typically lights up when too much pressure is being applied.
Two more promising traits that further adds to Oral-B 8000’s appeal are real time tracking and bluetooth, which monitors the current state of one’s mouth and provides them with useful feedback on their brushing habits, improving the state of their oral health over a prolonged period of time.
The DiamondClean Classic, on the other hand, is also just as compelling as the Oral-B 8000 due to multiple aspects. While it does lose points due to not having a pressure sensor, it contains 5 brushing modes just like its opponent, and comes with a built-in quadpacer and timer that prevents users from crossing the recommended brushing time of 2 minutes.
The Diamond Clean Classic also has an exceptionally sound battery life and has the ability to survive for over 14 days on an average. While the Li-Ion battery it contains isn’t necessarily an uncommon find, the battery life it has is miles better than the Oral-B 8000, which usually drains out after the 12th day.
The Diamond Clean classic offers 4 traditional brushing modes to users, but also comes with an additional mode called Deep Clean, which usually hosts sessions of 3 minutes at a time. Worry not, however, as the Sonicare technology it has is extremely gentle on the gums and teeth.
All in all, despite having a better battery life and a special brushing mode for sensitive gums and teeth, the DiamondClean Classic still falls short of becoming the better option over the Genius 8000. Sure, the battery life of 12 days could come as a concerning matter to many, especially those that travel on a regular basis.
However, since the 8000 has a quadpacer, an LED smart ring, real time tracking, and a better grip than the DiamondClean Classic, it leaves this bout as the winner, and our recommended pick.
Sonicare 7500 vs. Oral-B 7000
Oral-B and Philips didn’t just rise to prominence for producing quality-assured electric toothbrushes year after year, but became two of the best brands in the oral industry because it always offered affordability; a trait that is present in the Sonicare 7500 and Oral-B 7000.
|Model||Sonicare 7500||Oral-B 7000|
|Battery Life||2 Weeks||7 Days|
|Key Features||Minimal Build; LED lights; Li-Ion Battery||3D Technology; LED Light for Pressure Sensor|
|Recommended Pick||Oral-B 7000|
Sonicare 7500 brings to the table 4 top-grade cleaning modes; two of which prioritise gum health. Just like most mid tier models, it has a pressure sensor, a quadpacer, and a built-in timer that can be of assistance to those that are just switching from being a manual toothbrush user to an electric toothbrush user.
The design of the Sonicare 7500 is also a selling point of this model. The brush head is narrow in contrast to many options, which is efficient at cleaning hard-to-reach areas around the mouth. The handle also comes with two buttons; one for the power, and the other for the mode.
It has LED lights to provide users crucial details on the brushing mode that’s currently in use. In addition, underneath the handle is an icon for the battery, and an icon that unveils the status of the existing brush head.
The Oral-B 7000, on the other hand, is also packed with appealing characteristics. It comes with 6 brushing modes and contains 3D technology that can remove up to 500% more plaque than an average toothbrush. It also comes with an LED light indicator, which can be tough to notice under unfavourable lighting.
While the build of 7000 is no different than that of the Sonicare 7500, it might be tougher to recognize the brushing mode that is currently in use due to a lack of LED lights. Another issue that could be a concerning factor about this Oral-B model is regarding its battery life. Since it doesn’t contain a Li-Ion battery, this model only has a battery life of 7 days, which is miles below average.
In conclusion, this segment is more like a win-win scenario. For instance, if you want something that prioritises battery life and is easy to use, you can go forward with the Sonicare 7500. However, if you want access to more brushing modes, and constantly switch between brush heads, invest in the Oral-B 7000 to unlock its spacious travel case.
Sonicare 5300 vs. Oral-B 5000
Being a newbie in the world of electric toothbrushes comes with its fair share of ups and downs. While thoughts of investing in the best possible model out there could very well be existent, a rational decision you may go forward with is spending no more than $100 for your first electric toothbrush.
|Model||Sonicare 5300||Oral-B 5000|
|Battery Life||2 Weeks||10 Days|
|Key Features||Compatible with brush heads; Good battery life||Curvy handle; LED light as pressure sensor|
|Recommended Pick||Sonicare 5300|
Even though there are loads of options that you can consider with a budget of $100, two exceptional options that will give you impressive results in a short span of time are the Sonicare 5300 and Oral-B 5000.
Oral-B 5000 could be a bang for its buck when you take a closer look at its features. It comes with 5 modes, a pressure sensor, and bluetooth connectivity for analysing your brushing history.
The handle is also quite curvy, but carries tons of grip, which could help those that consider themselves to be clumsy. Behind the handle is an LED, which typically blinks when users are brushing with too much force, preventing gum and teeth damage in the long run.
All the above mentioned features could be music to the ears of many enthusiasts with a knack for dental hygiene, however, the battery life of the 5000 might be a dealbreaker. In contrast to most models, which includes the Sonicare 5300 as well, Oral-B 5000 can only last for 10 days at most.
The Sonicare 5300 lacks 2 brushing modes that can be found on Oral-B 5000, and comes with 3 generic brushing modes. However, it has a better battery life that typically lasts for 2 weeks, and contains all kinds of LED lights for its battery, brushing modes, and monitoring the state of the current brush head.
In addition to having a minimal build, the Sonicare 5300 is also compatible with all the brush heads that Sonicare has made so far, making it a tad bit better than the Oral-B 5000, but also a liability to those that want to experiment with different brushing modes.
Sonicare 4100 vs Oral-B 1000
If the above-mentioned options still don’t seem to fit your budget, you can always settle for something that is easier for your pockets. If you’re planning to invest in a model of Oral-B or Sonicare for that matter, you should definitely take into consideration the potential of the Sonicare 4100 and Oral-B 1000.
|Model||Sonicare 4100||Oral-B 1000|
|Battery Life||2 Weeks||10 Days|
|Quadpacer||None||Yes; 30 Second Interval|
|Key Features||Better for braces; Better battery life; Brush Sync Technology||3D cleaning action; Pressure Sensor; Quadpacer; Inexpensive|
|Recommended Pick||Oral-B 1000|
While both cater to minimalists, the Sonicare 4100 is also good for those that wear braces. If the default intensity mode seems too damaging for your gums and teeth, you can always tone it down using the other intensity mode it offers.
In addition to grabbing all the spotlight with its polished colorscheme, the 4100 is also convenient for those that fancy a good piece of equipment with an exceptional battery life. On an average, users can typically utilise the features of the Sonicare 4100 for over two weeks; which can increase significantly if you only brush once a day.
Oral-B 1000 is just as sublime as a tool for its value. It contains a quadpacer with 30 second intervals, 3D cleaning action that uses pulsating and rotating movements to clean up the residue of food particles and plaque around one’s mouth, a pressure sensor to prevent users from worsening their existing oral health conditions, and a good grip to use it seamlessly during every brushing session.
Despite having promising characteristics to enhance its presentability, the Oral-B 1000 comes with a poorly curated battery life, which only lasts for 10 days. Nonetheless, in this round, it does end up being victorious over the 4100; partially because of its price and useful features.
Sonicare 5100 vs Oral-B Gum and Sensitive Care
Gum disease is probably the most common oral health condition that many suffer from, which is exactly why Oral-B invented Oral-B Gum and Sensitive Care. Philips joined in on the journey, too, and it did so by releasing the Sonicare 5100.
Sonicare 5100 vs Oral-B Gum and Sensitive Care
Oral-B Gum and Sensitive care offers 3 different brushing modes to battle against gum diseases. It contains a gentle brush head that is surprisingly helpful for those with sensitive gums that are prone to damage, and also comes with a visible pressure sensor just in case too much force is being applied.
|Model||Sonicare 5100||Oral-B Gum & Sensitive Care|
|Battery Life||2 weeks||2 weeks|
|Key Features||Compatible with brush heads; exceptional battery life||Resolves gum disease; gentle brush head; visible pressure sensor|
|Recommended Pick||Oral-B Gum and Sensitive Care|
While the motor it contains can be a bit too loud in the morning at times, the fact that it has a 14 day battery life does make up for it by a tad bit, especially since that trait is a rare find in most Oral-B models.
Just like Sonicare 5300, the 5100 comes with 3 traditional brushing modes. It has a two week battery life just like its competitor, but also contains a brush head indicator on its handle that sets it apart from the opposition.
The build it contains is also exceptionally simple. It only has a button for the power, and another one for the 3 brushing modes that it has. While the packaging might seem underwhelming due to the very little amount of accessories that Sonicare offers with this model, this handle is compatible with a majority of the brush heads that Philips has come up with so far.
An indicator for the brush head could be extremely helpful for those that are just getting the hang of using an electric toothbrush. However, as the Oral-B Gum and Sensitive Care was solely made to resolve issues regarding gum disease, it definitely has the edge over the Sonicare 5100 in this scenario.
Sonicare vs. Oral-B Kids
Practising good oral hygiene on a daily basis is a priority, and should definitely be preached to your children as early as possible; which is an assignment that Oral-B and Sonicare understand.
If you’d like your kids to be as obsessed as you are about oral hygiene, but from an early age, you can very well invest in Sonicare for Kids or Oral-B Kids.
|Battery Life||3 Weeks||1 week|
|Key Features||Built-in timer; Coaching app; Bluetooth Connectivity; Lenient Grip||Quadpacer; Softer bristles on brush heads|
When it comes to efficiency, Sonicare knows exactly what to do. It has a built in timer, 2 brushing modes, and bluetooth connectivity. The built-in timer keeps track of the duration of each session, and typically reduces its intensity when the limit is crossed.
The bluetooth connectivity, on the other hand, is mainly used for the coaching app that Philips offers; an aspect you can definitely utilise if you want your kids to learn about all the proper forms and build good hygiene habits.
This Sonicare model also has an exceptional battery life of 3 weeks and is extremely easy to use due to its useful grip around the handles and simple yet unique groundwork.
The toothbrushes that Oral-B makes for kids aren’t too bad either. While the packaging does come with a brush head containing soft bristles, that aspect can be modified on various occasions in multiple ways as the piece of equipment is compatible with other brush heads of Oral-B.
While this Oral-B prototype doesn’t have a built-in timer or a coaching app, it does have a pressure sensor which controls the movement of the brush head, and a quadpacer that stops the brush head from rotating once the brushing session crosses its limit. Due to the chunky build that it has, this Oral-B model might run a bit big in the hands of kids.
At the end of the day, even though the electric toothbrush Oral-B has for kids does have softer and lenient shaped bristles, the quadpacer, charging stand, and impressive battery life really makes Sonicare for Kids a cut above its opponent in this bout.
Philips One vs. Oral-B Pro Health
Those that aren’t too intimidated by advanced technological features can also invest in battery powered models of Oral-B and Philips. Additionally, if the previous statement happens to be something that you resonate with, consider looking into Philips One and Oral-B Pro Health.
|Model||Philips One||Oral-B Pro Health|
|Battery Life||90 Days||225 Days|
|Key Features||Slim build; Good grip; Automatic shut off; subtle quadpacer; 90 day battery life; Durable travel case||Affordable price; 2D Technology; Long Battery Life|
|Recommended Pick||Philips One|
Philips One is a model that I’d like to call a travel-friendly model. Even though it only offers
one brushing mode, the battery life of Philips one is 90 days. It comprises a slim and grippy handle that is easy to navigate around the mouth, and also contains a built-in timer and quadpacer. A pressure sensor is nowhere to be found within this model, but it appears to decrease in speed once it runs for over 2 minutes.
Although the cleaning power of the Philips model comes as a liability, the straightforward hardware and software in addition to the travel case and lengthy battery life makes it a diamond in the rough.
On another note, if you prioritise performance over convenience, Oral-B Pro Health should definitely be the go-to option. In addition to having a battery life of 225 days, the 2D technology that this model comes with is more efficient at thoroughly cleaning and improving one’s dental health; especially due to the pulsations and rotations, While it lacks a timer, pressure sensor, and quadpacer, it is more affordable than a Philips One. It might also run a bit chunky, but that shouldn’t be an issue if you use this electric toothbrush as a Plan B.
When all is said and done, Philips One is easily the better option. Despite having a worse battery life than the Oral-B model, the quadpacer and built-in timer that it has makes Philips one the better candidate. It also comes with a travel case, further securing the edge it has over the Oral-B Pro Health.
Philips and Oral-B will always be two of the front-running brands in oral hygiene, especially if they remain consistent over the next few years. Though it is difficult to not side with Philips Sonicare due to how user-friendly it is, it could be dismissed over Oral-B if the value is taken into consideration.
Sure, Brush sync technology is definitely the most promising feature Philips has ever come up with, but since their models are more expensive than that of Oral-B’s, Oral-B is surely the brand that is more dominant in contrast to Philips, and miles ahead as opposed to its other competitors. In short, Oral-B is the brand to look into if you’re seeking a way to say goodbye to all your oral health issues; indefinitely.